¶1George Thomas and his third wife, Louise, made their note for four hundred dollars, gold, to Ernest Engelke, and secured the same by deed of trust over lot 10 in Block 150 in the city of Galveston, with all the improvements thereon. Thomas M. Joseph, the trustee, sold the property on the 20th of November, 1868, and Mrs. Hartman became the purchaser, receiving a deed from the trustee. Louise Thomas died. George Thomas and his minor children by his first wife, Catharine, remained in possession of the property, and on the 11th of November, 1869, Mrs. Hartman brought her action of trespass to try title, claiming only the interest of George Thomas in the lot, admitting the right of the- minor children of Catharine Thomas, deceased, to their mother’s community interest; but the plaintiff claimed to be sole owner of the improvements, praying for an injunction against George Thomas, the appointment of a receiver, and partition of the property between herself and the minor defendants. It is admitted that the property was acquired by George Thomas and his first wife, Catharine, in 1857, and appropriated and continuously occupied as a homestead.
¶2The death of Catharine Thomas is admitted.
¶3The children could not control the father in the sale of the homestead as such; but he could not encumber nor dispose of the community interest which descended to them from their *92mother. The cause was submitted to the court at the March term, 1871; a judgment and decree followed, confirming the right of the plaintiff to the undivided one-half of the property, and further decreeing that the right of the plaintiff in the property was subject to the use of the minor defendants, as a homestead, until each of them should die, attain their majority, or acquire another homestead. In either event the plaintiff should then have her election to a partition of the property, or to have it sold and the proceeds equally divided between herself and the minor children.
¶4George Thomas was to pay the costs, and a counsel fee of fifty dollars to the attorney of the minor defendants. A motion for a new'trial was made and overruled, and the ease brought to this court on appeal.
¶5The decree is in part erroneous. Mrs. Hartman is a tenant in common with the children of George and Catharine Thomas, and as such is entitled to partition; or, if partition is not demanded, she is entitled to one-half the rents and profits of the property.
¶6As we have before said, the children could not control the father in the disposition of the homestead, but they could control him in any effort to sell the estate which descended to them.
¶7If partition is demanded, the costs should be divided as in like eases.
¶8The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the cause remanded, to be proceeded in in accordance with this opinion.
¶9Reversed and remanded.