¶1(dissenting) — I cannot concur in the conclusion of the majority on the first proposition discussed. It is conceded that the trial court committed error in ruling as it did, and, as the appellant excepted to that ruling, appealed from the judgment pronounced against him, and assigned the ruling as error, I can see no reason why he should not have the error reviewed in this court. The judgment should he reversed, and a new trial ordered.
37 Wash. 24
State v. Patchen
Decided February 6, 1905
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1905-02-06
<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered September 5, 1903, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of rape.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1905-02-06
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1966
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →