Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. 2d 418 - Hirt v. Entus

37 Wash. 2d 418 - Hirt v. Entus’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District (1956), State v. Jacobs (1963)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

9019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Company v. Schurmeir · Mitchell v. Smale · State of Missouri v. State of Nebraska State of Nebraska · Producers Oil Company v. Lydia Hanzen · Brown v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where a person has knowledge of a bona fide boundary dispute, and thereafter consciously, deliberately, and intentionally enters upon the disputed area for the purpose of destroying, and does destroy, trees or other property which cannot be replaced, such acts are neither casual nor involuntary, nor can they be justified upon the basis of probable cause for belief by the tort feasor that he owned the land, but, on the contrary, are without lawful authority and will subject such person to treble damages as provided by statute."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This sudden and rapid change is termed in law an avulsion, and differs from an accretion in that the one is violent and visible, while the other is gradual, and perceptible only after a lapse of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.