37 Wash. 2d 511 - Robinson v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 128 Cal. App. 363 - Schnerr v. Schnerr · 106 Cal. App. 485 - Ex Parte Weiler · 61 Cal. App. 64 - Tripp v. Superior Court · Tegtmeyer v. Tegtmeyer · Brevet v. Brevet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the making of a conveyance by a representative of the court if the party fails or refuses to make it... [t]here is nothing peculiar in its application, where necessary, to carry out what the court is empowered to do by way of adjustment of rights and interests.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is our view that, when the parties to a pending divorce proceeding enter into a property settlement agreement which is made an exhibit in the case and in which it is stipulated that it may be made a part of the decree, and when the court approves it and incorporates it into the decree the same as though specifically set forth therein, such an agreement and stipulation is sufficiently made a part of the decree to warrant its enforcement by one of the writs ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as they relate to the payment of money (as distinguished from alimony or support money for children), cannot be enforced by contempt proceedings. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.