Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. App. 424 - Painter v. Olney

37 Wash. App. 424 - Painter v. Olney’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably 111 Wash. 2d 471 - Martin v. Meier (1988), 121 Wash. 2d 135 - Martin v. Triol (1993)

25 state decisions

130198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 8 Wash. App. 36 - Thayer v. Edmonds · Interior Warehouse Co. v. Hays · Schmelling v. Hoffman · 4 Wash. App. 616 - Dobbins v. Beal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First and basic to any litigation is jurisdiction. First and basic to jurisdiction is service of process. Statutes authorizing service by means other than personal service, i.e., constructive and substituted service, require strict compliance.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the defendant cannot be found within the state, and upon the filing of an affidavit of the plaintiff, his agent, or attorney, with the clerk of the court, stating that he believes that the defendant is not a resident of the state, or cannot be found therein . . . the service may be made by publication of the summons ... in any of the following cases: (2) When the defendant, being a resident of this state, has departed therefrom with intent to defraud his creditors, or to avoid the service of a summons, or keeps himself concealed therein with like intent; (4) When the action is for divorce in the cases prescribed by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.