Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. App. 539 - State v. Lawson

37 Wash. App. 539 - State v. Lawson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2010

15 state decisions

501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mullaney v. Wilbur · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Morrison v. People of State of California · Weingarden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decisions are manifold that within limits of reason and fairness the burden of proof may be lifted from the state in criminal prosecutions and cast on a defendant. The limits are in substance these, that the state shall have proved enough to make it just for the defendant to be required to repel what has been proved with excuse or explanation, or at least that upon a balancing of convenience or of the opportunities for knowledge the shifting of the burden will be found to be an aid to the accuser without subjecting the accused to hardship or oppression. Cf. Wigmore, Evidence, Vol. 5, §§ 2486, 2512 and cases cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unlawful for any person under the age of twenty-one years to acquire or have in his possession or consume any liquor ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.