Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. App. 761 - Simonson v. Veit

37 Wash. App. 761 - Simonson v. Veit’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2000

7 state decisions

30198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb · 99 Wash. 2d 95 - Thomas v. French · 91 Wash. 2d 223 - Seattle-First National Bank v. Kawachi · 26 Wash. 2d 690 - Roediger v. Cullen · 61 Wash. 2d 509 - Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he reasoning behind the rule is that a timely petition for rehearing suspends the finality of the judgment pending that court’s further determination on whether the judgment should be modified .... A similar analysis was used in Sitko v. Rowe, 195 Wash. 81 , 79 P.2d 688 (1938), where the court held that the time for a notice of appeal does not begin to run until the entry of an order denying the motion for a new trial. It would serve no purpose to require appellants to file a notice of appeal while a motion for reconsideration or new trial was pending in the court below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]here shall be no limitation to actions brought in the name or for the benefit of the state, and no claim of right predicated upon the lapse of time shall ever be asserted against the state: . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.