Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. App. 768 - State v. McDaniel

37 Wash. App. 768 - State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2007

7 state decisions

50198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 99 Wash. 2d 95 - Thomas v. French · 36 Wash. App. 564 - State v. Ellison · 35 Wash. App. 855 - State v. Harper · 25 Wash. App. 746 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence which counteracts a suggestion that the witness changed his story in response to some threat or scheme or bribe by showing that his story was the same prior to the external pressure is highly relevant in shedding light on the witness' credibility. Evidence which merely shows that the witness said the same thing on other occasions when his motive was the same does not have much probative force "for the simple reason that mere repetition does not imply veracity."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross examination concerning the statement, and the statement is . . . consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to rebut . . . [a] charge . . . of recent fabrication or improper . . . motive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.