Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wash. App. 791 - Hackler v. Hackler

37 Wash. App. 791 - Hackler v. Hackler’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc. (1988), 58 Wash. App. 32 - Clemmons v. Fidler (1990)

10 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

1401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 92 Wash. 2d 21 - Transamerica Insurance Group v. United Pacific Insurance · 89 Wash. 2d 104 - Jacobsen v. State · 93 Wash. 2d 596 - Olympic Fish Products, Inc. v. Lloyd · 56 Wash. 2d 564 - Owens v. Kuro · 91 Wash. 2d 616 - Griffin v. Department of Social & Health Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who was a witness in an action, fully acquainted with its character and object and interested in its results, is estopped by the judgment as fully as if he had been a party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “mutual or successive relationship to the same right or property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Its binding effect flows from the fact that the successor who acquires an interest in the right is affected by the adjudication in the hands of the former owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.