Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 WIS2D 56 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Pointer v. Texas · Great Northern Ry Co v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Certainly these delays should be minimized in our criminal justice system. To effectuate that end we adopt a rule, for prospective application only, that at an indigent defendant’s initial appearance before a court or magistrate he be advised of his right to counsel and that counsel be appointed at that time unless intelligently waived.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.