Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Wis. 2d 70 - Algrem v. Nowlan

37 Wis. 2d 70 - Algrem v. Nowlan’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 92 Wis. 2d 17 - Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co. (1979), Badger Pharmacal, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (1993)

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions

180196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co. · Cernohorsky v. Northern Liquid Gas Co. · Spoehr v. Mittelstadt · Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. · 27 Wis. 2d 456 - Engel v. Bindel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'when parties to a contract adopt a provision . . . which contains no element of ambiguity, the court has no right, by a process of interpretation to relieve one of them from any disadvantageous terms which [it] has actually made'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In cases where the damage results solely from the negligence of the indemnitee, and the indemnitee seeks recovery from the indemnitor, this court and the overwhelming majority of other state courts apply the rule that the indemnity contracts will be strictly construed. In Mustas v. Inland Construction, Inc. (1963), 19 Wis. 2d 194 , 120 N. W. 2d 95 , 121 N. W. 2d 274 , this court held a broad indemnity clause inapplicable because it did not expressly provide for indemnification of damages caused solely by the negligence of the indemnitee.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[T]he rule of no liability of the employer over and above that imposed by the Workmen's Compensation Act does not apply in case of an express agreement for indemnification.1”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.