Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

370 F.2d 369

Docket No. 20831.

James David McClain v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-12-27

2 counsel of record

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Linkletter v. Walker · White v. Beto

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-12-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2000

12 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

14019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James David McClain, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., Robert R. Granucci, Frank C. Damrell, Jr., Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

On this appeal from denial of habeas corpus the error assigned is that evidence, secured by search of appellant's residence and automobile, was improperly received in evidence in appellant's trial in the state court, since the search was without warrant and the arrest of appellant which preceded it was without warrant or probable cause.

¶2

The District Court ruled that since, under Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965), Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), was not to be applied retroactively, appellant's contentions were without merit in reference to his conviction which became final December 15, 1960. We agree.

¶3

Appellant contends that Linkletter should not control and that retroactive application of Mapp is proper here, since California, prior to Mapp, had a state rule excluding evidence obtained in an unreasonable search.

¶4

We disagree. California's voluntary acceptance of federal standards did not thereby open the door to federal review of state action upon what still remained a question of state law. Linkletter establishes that the right of an accused to Fourth Amendment federal review of state rulings on admissibility dates from Mapp.

¶5

Affirmed.

/370/f2d/369 · .json · Public domain