Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 F.2d 652 - King v. Gardner

King v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

370 F.2d 652 · 1967

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
November 1990
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 1990 · most notably Rayborn v. Weinberger (1975), 489 F. Supp. 683 - Crowe v. Harris (1980)

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1401967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Celebrezze · Erickson v. Ribicoff · Celebrezze v. Kelly · Justice v. Gardner · King v. Celebrezze

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(I)t was his burden, however, to establish that he was thereby prevented from engaging in ‘any substantial gainful activity,’ within the meaning of the Social Security Act. * * * “Sharing the District Judge’s feeling, we regret that we cannot provide Mr. King with a remedy that might in some degree make up to him the burden of his affliction. The law, however, has not given us the means to do so.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . [the] inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months . . .”42 U.S.C.A. § 423(d)(1)(A).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.