Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 F.2d 759 - United States v. Vida

United States v. Vida’s Empirical Analysis

370 F.2d 759 · 1966

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
4
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 1998 · most notably Tillman v. United States (1969), United States v. Warner (1982)

60 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2901966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · Dunn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““to obtain supplies, make quick sales, collect the proceeds, and then allow the company to fall into bankruptcy, making off with such loot as might meanwhile have been gathered.” Kap-lan v. United States, 7 F.2d 594 , 595 (2d Cir. 1925).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We are not disposed to fashion a rule heretofore unknown in the jurisprudence of criminal prosecutions. Neither are we impressed that the testimony of an unsentenced accomplice deprives one who stands trial of due process or fair treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “With increasing emphasis, we are cautioned that the patent guilt of an accused is wholly immaterial to an appellate court’s consideration of the adequacy of a trial court’s protection of his constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.