United States v. Daney’s Empirical Analysis
370 F.2d 791 · 1966
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Capoeman v. United States (1971), Oropallo v. United States (1993)
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burnet v. Harmel · Palmer v. Bender · Squire v. Capoeman · Anderson v. Helvering · Thomas v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The language of the statute purports to put Indians and other citizens of Oklahoma on -equal footing only as regards minerals produced. The Indians still enjoy the special tax advantage as to other income from the allotted, restricted lands. That advantage must be preserved to carry out the Congressional purpose behind the allotment system.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.