Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 F.2d 969 - The Boeing Company v. International Union

The Boeing Company v. International Union’s Empirical Analysis

370 F.2d 969 · 1967

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Joseph A. San Filippo v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America (1975), Lucas v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. (1981)

43 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

380196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Difronzo v. United States · Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50 American Bakery Confectionery Workers International · Switzerland Cheese Association Inc v. E Horne's Market Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the arbitration clause is not susceptible of a construction that the plaintiff was bound to arbitrate.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Faultless Division v. Local Lodge No. 2040 of District 153 International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers · Local 464, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union v. Hershey Chocolate Corp.
  2. “not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. General Foam Corp. v. District 50, United Mine Workers · Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, Local No. 295 v. Servomation Corp.
  3. “Absent a contractual obligation to the contrary, a reluctant party [to arbitrate] is free to pursue any available legal remedy to redress its grievances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lehigh Portland Cement v. Cement, Lime, Wkrs · Lehigh Portland Cement Company v. Cement Lime Gypsum and Allied Workers

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.