Madej v. Briley’s Empirical Analysis
370 F.3d 665 · 2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler · Carroll v. Yates · A.M. v. Butler · A.M. v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No state court can countermand an order, issued by a federal court, implementing the Constitution of the United States”). But Parker cites no authority giving federal courts the authority to hold a state appellate court in contempt and our research reveals none. Moreover, the OCCA’s order is clearly appropriate and is not contrary to the federal district court’s order awarding habeas relief. Parker claims there are but two instances where he has been sanctioned, but the statute says nothing about previous sanctions being necessary. Parker has had numerous filings dismissed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.