Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 F.3d 668 - Crue v. Aiken

Crue v. Aiken’s Empirical Analysis

370 F.3d 668 · 2004

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Nelson v. Miller (2009), Fairley v. Andrews (2009)

22 federal appellate ·

240200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Wolff v. McDonnell · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a claim for injunctive relief is barred but a claim for damages remains, a declaratory judgment as a predicate to a damages award can survive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not outweighed by [the university's] fear that an athletic association might not approve of what [members of the community] say”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.