Wilson v. Miami-Dade County’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 593 So. 2d 500 - McCain v. Florida Power Corporation · 543 So. 2d 732 - Kaisner v. Kolb · 436 So. 2d 33 - Stevens v. Jefferson · Lewis v. City of St. Petersburg · 529 So. 2d 258 - Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Yamuni
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The decision as to how to implement or operate a policy is secondary to the decision to create the policy.... Methods of implementation of policy are at best a secondary concern. Plaintiff, in this case is asking the Court to consider the way in which this policy was implemented and not its fundamental wisdom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“will not entangle [the judiciary] in fundamental questions of public policy or planning. It merely will require the courts to determine if the officers should have acted in a manner more consistent with the safety of the individual[] involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.