Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 Ill. 325 - Fleming v. Dillon

Fleming v. Dillon’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 111 Ill. 2d 350 - Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp. (1986), 97 Ill. App. 3d 22 - Foster Enterprises, Inc. v. Germania Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1981)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

1701938194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. Parrett · Pillsbury v. Early · Fletcher v. Osborn · Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security · Schroeder v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If coexistent remedies are consistent with each other, a party may adopt all or select any one which he thinks best suited to the end sought, and only the satisfaction of the claim in one case constitutes a bar of the other. [Citations.] # # # For one proceeding to be a bar to another, the remedies must proceed from opposite and irreconcilable claims of right and must be so inconsistent that a party could not logically assume to follow one without renouncing the other. [Citation.]” Fleming v. Dillon, 370 Ill. 325, 331-32 , 18 N.E.2d 910, 913 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If coexistent remedies are consistent with each other, a party may adopt all or select any one which he thinks best suited to the end sought, and only the satisfaction of the claim in one case constitutes a bar of the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.