Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 Md. 227 - Smith v. Borello

Smith v. Borello’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2021

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

110200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · 2 Cal. 4th 1064 - Burgess v. Superior Court · Carey v. Lovett · Stewart v. United Electric Light & Power Co. · Dietrich v. Inhabitants of Northampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he recovery, in other words, is for the psychic injury inflicted 'on the mother and not for her sorrow over the loss of the child. Recovery for that sorrow must be had, if at all, under the wrongful death statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The major issue with which [courts considering emotional distress arising from a miscarriage or stillbirth] have wrestled is defining the kinds of damages that are allowable in the mother's action so as neither to duplicate damages afforded in a wrongful death action nor to permit damages that, under the State's law, clearly are not allowed, even in a wrongful death action. The demarcation lines drawn by the courts are not always consistent and they are not always clearly articulated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether, and to what extent, the injured mother of a previable fetus, miscarried as a result of a defendant’s negligence, can recover as damages for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress, emotional trauma, anguish, depression and/or grief resulting from the loss of her fetus?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.