Shellenberger v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on House v. Mainka · Anderson v. Francis · Williams v. Bailey · Sarkeys v. Evans · Morton v. Orsdol
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Title to land cannot be acquired by adverse possession unless the possession is open, notorious, hostile,. (and exclusive, and it is also essential that such possession, in order that it may ripen into title, should be shown to be continuous and uninterrupted for the full statutory period. The moment the possession is broken it ceases to be effectual, because as soon as, and as often as, a break occurs the law restores the constructive possession of the owner.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. Dean““In order to apply 12 O.S.1951 § 93, in bar of an attack upon a void tax deed, it must be shown by the evidence that the holder thereof has recorded his tax deed and has been in possession of the land therein described for five continuous years.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. Dean““When the land is vacant, the constructive possession is in the valid title holder. * * * »”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. Dean
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.