Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 P.2d 34 - Foreman v. State

Foreman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1982

7 state decisions

30196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wroth · 87 Okla. Crim. 313 - Lowrey v. State · People v. Knapp · 89 Okla. Crim. 294 - Ladd v. State · 5 Okla. Crim. 522 - Ridley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After hearing the charge, the jury may either decide in court, or may retire for deliberation. If they do not agree without retiring, one or more officers must be sworn to keep them together in some private and convenient place, and not to permit any person to speak to or communicate with them, nor do so themselves, unless it be by order of the court, or to ask whether they have agreed upon a verdict, and so agreed, or when ordered by the court.” [Emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Scott v. State
  2. ““It is of the utmost importance that jurors and court officials should be held to a strict observance of the provisions of law prescribing their procedure and duties, and their conduct should be such that no possible suspicion can attach to them of having acted in a manner prejudicial to the accused, or in his favor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Scott v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.