Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 P2D 46 - Clark v. State

Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1982

18 state decisions

140196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lyle · Robinson v. United States · State v. Lee · 61 Okla. Crim. 18 - Pulliam v. State · 91 Okla. Crim. 294 - McCarthy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rebuttal evidence in [a] criminal case is that which is given by the state to explain, repel, counteract, contradict, or disprove, evidence introduced by or on behalf of the defendant.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"`In nearly every case, we find evidence introduced as rebuttal which might properly have been introduced in support of the case in chief, but this is not the sole test. The question which arises and is directed to the discretion of the trial court is whether the evidence offered in rebuttal is a rehash of the State's case in chief, or whether it pertains to some material issue which has become important because of effect of evidence introduced on behalf of defendant.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““It has been repeatedly held that such matter is within the trial court’s discretion, in furtherance of justice, to permit rebuttal testimony which was competent evidence in chief. Tingley v. State, 16 Okl.Cr. 639 , 184 P. 599 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.