Glasgow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holt v. United States · Marshall v. United States · People v. Santo · 41 Cal. 2d 814 - People v. Wayne · People v. Stroble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Before the final submission of a case to the jury, the burden to show prejudice from an alleged misconduct is on the defendant. 2. The burden is on the defendant to make a showing that the jury’s verdict was influenced by any alleged unfavorable newspaper article. 3. Where jurors read newspaper comments on the trial the verdict will not be set aside if the defendant is not prejudiced thereby, or if objection might be, but was not, made prior to verdict. 4. A claim of misconduct of a juror before a criminal case is submitted to a jury is not to be determined by inference or on the basis of speculation, but must be established by clear and convincing proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Teafatiller v. State““1. Before the final submission of a case to the jury, the burden to show prejudice from an alleged misconduct is on defendant. “2. The burden is on the appellant to make a showing that the jury’s verdict was influenced by any alleged unfavorable newspaper article. “3. Where jurors read newspaper comments on the trial the verdict will not be set aside if defendant is not prejudiced thereby, or if objection might be, but was not, made prior to verdict. “4. A claim of misconduct of a juror before a criminal case is submitted to a jury is not to be determined by inference or on the basis of speculation, but must be established by clear and convincing proof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Broadus v. State““ ‘Before the final submission of a case to the jury, the burden to show prejudice from an alleged misconduct is on defendant.’ ‘The burden is on the appülant to make a showing that the jury’s verdict was invluenced [sic] by an alleged unfavorable newspaper article.’ ‘A claim of misconduct of a juror before a criminal case is submitted to a jury is not to be determined by inference or on the basis of speculation, but must be established by clear and convincing proof.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.