Mitchell v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1673
Relies on Breck v. Ulmer · Kowalski v. Kowalski · Peterson v. Ek · Nass v. Seaton · Limeres v. Limeres
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Similarly, the relevant section of the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act deals exclusively with wage garnishment and has no bearing on the amount of child support that may be awarded by a court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e consider a claim to be raised when the 'briefing was such that [the court] could discern [the party's] legal arguments and [the opposing party] could reply to them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e review matters that were not raised below and not listed in a statement of points on appeal for plain error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.