State v. Fyfe’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Chaney · 32 Cal. 4th 588 - In Re Jesusa · State v. Sutherland · State v. Alex · 32 Cal. 4th 588 - Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Heriberto C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intend[s] 'every word ... of a statute to have some purpose, force, and effect'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the plainer the statutory language is, the more convincing the evidence of contrary legislative purpose or intent must be”). 55 .See Johnson v. State, 188 P.3d 700, 702 (Alaska App. 2008) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coleman v. State“Jury instructions involve questions of law to which we apply our independent judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.