¶1The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We are confident that it will be unnecessary for this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus and that the respondent judicial referee upon receipt of this opinion will comply with this court’s directive as stated above. It is so ordered.
370 So. 2d 1227
Granda v. Siegendorf
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 15, 1979
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-05-15
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2010
3 state decisions
Relies on Boston Investments, Inc. v. Horowitz · 368 So. 2d 1342 - Hewitt v. Caffee · Grossman v. Duncan
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1979-05-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →