370 So. 2d 1241 - Carter v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 301 So. 2d 7 - State v. Barber · 370 So. 2d 1137 - Ladoga Canning Corp. v. McKenzie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“enjoins, or attempts to enjoin, some conduct which may or may not be criminal under the laws of Florida, and which has not been shown to bear any relationship to the legitimate purposes of bail, that is, to insure the defendant's appearance at future court proceedings, ... the right to a prior judicial determination of what may be enjoined as obscene may not be cireum-vented. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tinsley v. State“engage in employment connected with or dealing in the possession of obscene materials with the intent to show, sell or distribute the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tinsley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.