Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

370 So. 2d 311

Knight v. Sager

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1979

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 1979-04-27

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1994

6 state decisions

Relies on 46 Ala. App. 617 - Muery v. Muery · Mount v. State · Muery v. Muery

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-04-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

¶1This is an appeal from denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

¶2Appellant, Samuel Earl Knight, was incarcerated in the Monroe County jail on October 28, 1978, for failure to make support payments to his ex-wife. He filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with a supporting affidavit of poverty on March 21, 1979. Without evidentiary hearing the trial court granted appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis but denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

¶3In appellant’s affidavit of poverty, he swore that he had no job, no money, and no assets. Our cases have held that imprisonment for contempt should never be imposed by a judge where the failure to pay support is not from willful contumacy, but from inability to comply with the order. Hayes v. Hayes, 339 So.2d 84 (Ala.Civ.App.1976); Muery v. Muery, 46 Ala.App. 617, 247 So.2d 123, cert. denied, 287 Ala. 737, 247 So.2d 128 (1971).

¶4Because of the trial court’s grant of the appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pau-peris, we consider the record shows the appellant financially unable to purge himself of contempt. He is therefore entitled to be discharged from custody.

¶5The denial of habeas corpus is reversed and the trial court is directed to grant the writ and discharge the appellant from custody.

¶6REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTION.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
/370/so2d/311 · .json · Public domain