Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 So. 2d 547 - State v. Brown

370 So. 2d 547 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
9
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 441 So. 2d 707 - State v. Flowers (1983), 446 So. 2d 280 - State v. Ossey (1984)

28 state decisions

150197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Spinelli v. United States · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Oates · United States v. Pope

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is now well established that the mere fact that a defendant's behavior while under surveillance at the airport correlates with various elements of a drug courier profile does not by itself provide reasonable cause to stop and detain him for questioning. State v. Washington, 364 So.2d 958 (La.1978); State v. Matthews, 366 So.2d 1348 (La.1978). However, it does not follow that such factors are to be wholly disregarded in determining whether reasonable cause exists. Components of the profile, and defendant's conformance thereto, may be considered, along with other relevant information known to the officer, in evaluating whether he had reasonable cause to stop and detain a defendant. [emphasis supplied] 370 So.2d at 549 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.