Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 So. 2d 708 - Clements v. State

370 So. 2d 708 - Clements v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Johnson v. State (1992), 548 So. 2d 526 - Hallford v. State (1988)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Coker v. Georgia · Stokley v. State · Cobern v. State · Jordan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'In Cobern v. State , 273 Ala. 547 , 142 So.2d 869 (1962), the Alabama Supreme Court held that the fact that the victim was dead at the time the property was taken would not militate [against a finding of] the crime of robbery if the intervening time between the murder and the taking formed a continuous chain of events. See also Baker v. State , Ala. Cr. App., 344 So.2d 547 (1977). In the instant case, the intervening time, if any there be, formed a continuous chain of events.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence of intent under this section shall not be supplied by the felony-murder doctrine.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “"He [the defendant] could be charged equally with Beck for the murder of Mrs. Ford even though he did not personally do the killing. Under the facts set out in the record, the jury could infer that Clements had reason to know before going to the residence that Beck was sharpening his knife for a killing should such become necessary to effect the planned robbery." Clements, 370 So.2d at 723.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.