Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 SO2D 977 - Coleman v. Sparkman

Coleman v. Sparkman’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Howard v. Pike · McBride v. Sullivan · Moore v. Terry · Martin v. Martin · Hunter v. Whitworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Recognition is essential and must be unambiguous and clear in its character. Howard v. Pike, 290 Ala. 213 , 275 So.2d 645 (1973); Martin v. Martin, 233 Ala. 310 , 171 So. 734 (1937). Recognition is shown by the manner of treatment, how the child is regarded and held in thought, and does not depend upon a showing of actual parentage. Moore v. Terry, 220 Ala. 47 , 124 So. 80 (1929). Moreover, publication of the parentage of the child before the marriage is unnecessary. McBride v. Sullivan, 155 Ala. 166 , 45 So. 902 (1908).... The essence of recognition is the treatment of the child as one’s own, including an acknowledgement of parenthood, which we deem to mean acquiescence in the relationship of parent and child.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.