Farrell v. Farrell’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1973
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carle v. Carle · Williams v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Williams v. Williams, 160 Tex. 99 , 325 S.W.2d 682 at page 684 our Supreme Court said: ‘The trial court’s conclusion that the division was fair, just and equitable is an independent conclusion and will support the judgment. It was not attacked by point of error in petitioner’s brief in the Court of Civil Appeals. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals may rest on that conclusion.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gaulding v. Gaulding
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.