In Re Wines’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
November 1985
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Veach · In Matter of Conner · In Re Woodward · In Re Randolph · In Re Downs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We feel that the extent and duration of the practices respondent thus engaged in, his rather callous attitude toward the use of “resumes” regardless of their obviously deceptive appearances, his affirmative alteration of the history of accident in one case, the alteration of “incurred” medical expenses, and the submission (with no investigation at best) of an admittedly false receipted bill for car repair, impel us to go further [than admonition].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Wines“A custom may not be regarded as a complete vindication when a lawyer is charged with misrepresentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.