Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 SW2D 328 - In Re Wines

In Re Wines’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Veach · In Matter of Conner · In Re Woodward · In Re Randolph · In Re Downs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We feel that the extent and duration of the practices respondent thus engaged in, his rather callous attitude toward the use of “resumes” regardless of their obviously deceptive appearances, his affirmative alteration of the history of accident in one case, the alteration of “incurred” medical expenses, and the submission (with no investigation at best) of an admittedly false receipted bill for car repair, impel us to go further [than admonition].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A custom may not be regarded as a complete vindication when a lawyer is charged with misrepresentation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.