Hill v. Caparino’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1991
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn · Allen v. Western Alliance Insurance Co. · Masten v. Masten · Frierson v. Modern Mut. Health & Accident Ins. Co. · Richards v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 21a provides that any notice required by the Rules may be served by delivering a copy of the document to the attorney of record of the party to be served, in person or by registered or certified mail. A certificate that notice has been so given constitutes prima facie proof of service. The trial court was authorized to determine from evidence other than the prima facie proof mentioned in Rule 21a that the appellant had received the Request for Admissions and the date on which such request was received. Farmer v. Cassity, Tex.Civ.App, 252 S.W.2d 788 ; Parr v. Leal ex rel. Duval County, Tex.Civ. App, 290 S.W.2d 536 ; Bell v. Jasper Lumber Company, Tex.Civ.App, 287 S.W.2d 746 , writ dism.; Billingslea v. Greaves, Tex.Civ.App, 196 S.W.2d 945 ; Cunningham v. Associates Investment Co., Tex.Civ.App, 295 S.W.2d 687 , err. dism. (emphasis ours).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the absence of a motion to permit a late filing of the answer, there can be no complaint of the action of the trial court in entering his order decreeing that the Request for Admissions of Relevant Facts be deemed answered affirmatively.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mathes v. Kelton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.