Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

370 S.W.3d 292

Penny v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-05-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2016

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Maurice Penny appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree robbery. Penny contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to strike an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

/370/sw3d/292 · .json · Public domain