370 Wis. 2d 139 - State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Scheffer · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano · Martindale v. Ripp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The testimony of the expert witness met the WIS. STAT . § 907.02 standards governing the admission of expert testimony; (2) The expert testimony was "clearly relevant to a material issue" in the case; (3) The expert testimony was necessary to the defendant's case; and (4) The probative value of the expert testimony outweighed its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause Dr. Thompson could not offer any conclusion as to whether [the victim's] testimony had been influenced by suggestive interview techniques, Thompson's testimony would not have made it less probable that [the victim's] account at trial was accurate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mislead or confuse the jury by requiring them to speculate about what had occurred”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.