Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 370 Wis. 2d 661 - State v. Cameron

370 Wis. 2d 661 - State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis · McKnight ex rel. Ludwig v. Johnson Controls, Inc. · Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt · State v. Davidson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not demonstrated this is an exceptional case requiring our discretionary grant of a new trial because we are satisfied that the real controversy has been fully tried.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the jury had before it evidence not properly admitted which so clouded a crucial issue that it may be fairly said that the real controversy was not fully tried.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the jury was erroneously not given the opportunity to hear important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.