Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 A.2d 633 - Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc.

Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2005

1 district · 16 state decisions

701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patrick v. J. B. Ham Co. · Brown's Case · Gauthier's Case · Westman's Case · Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the employer takes the employee as he finds him, but, even so, where the employee already suffers from a preexisting infirmity in dormant stage, its activation or exacerbation from an asymptomatic condition to a symptomatic one during the course of the employment is not compensable . . . unless the flare up arises out of the employment, meaning that it must be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause, and not be solely due to a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““An employee is, of course, entitled to compensation for a disability proximately caused by his employment regardless of whether his condition at the time of injury was average or subnormal. Thus, a work injury that aggravates a pre-exist-ing condition is compensable even though a physically normal employee would have been unaffected, provided the injury occurs under conditions that would otherwise entitle the employee to compensation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.