In Re Ebel’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 329
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · D.H. Overmyer, Co. v. Robson · In the Matter of John a Maurice Appeal of Kenneth a Kozel · Cunningham v. Ayers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the responsibility to take action in order to protect the integrity of the [c]ourt, its bar, and the public from ... misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. Fitzgerald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.