Doby v. Beto’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We hold that in these circumstances the failure to object in the state courts cannot bar the petitioner from asserting this federal right..... Defendants can no more be charged with anticipating the Griffin [Griffin v. State of California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct. 1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 ] decision than can the States. Petitioner had exhausted his appeals in the Ohio courts and was seeking direct review here when Griffin was handed down. Thus, his failure to object to a practice which Ohio had long allowed cannot strip him of his right to attack the practice following its invalidation by this Court.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Commonwealth v. Hill

2. “Appellant applied [to the State Appellate Court] for rehearing on the basis of Aguilar, for the first time asserting that the affidavit did not support the search warrant because of lack of probable cause.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hoover v. Beto

3. “It is not necessary that appellant rely on the Aguilar decision retroactively since his conviction was not final when the decision in Aguilar was rendered.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hoover v. Beto