United States v. Barney’s Empirical Analysis
371 F.2d 166 · 1966
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 1984 · most notably United States v. Ziperstein (1979), United States v. William A. Hines, United States of America v. Theodore M. Ware (1972)
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3481
Relies on Mills v. Alabama · Wisconsin v. Illinois · Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner · United States v. Doremus · Stewart v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“than momentarily illuminate the obvious fact that the defendant did not choose to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the attempts to call the defendant to the stand add anything to the comments relied upon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no direct comments on a defendant's silence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.