Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F.2d 172 - Gray v. Morgan

Gray v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

371 F.2d 172 · 1966

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. Eastman (1969), Bland v. McHann (1972)

25 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

360196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Huffman · Matthews v. Rodgers · Holt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Thus far, at least, it is quite clear that the courts have generally treated this statute as applicable to persorial liberty rather than a property or monetary claim.” 371 F.2d at 175 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In the instant case, we have no claim of the denial of procedural due process. Plaintiffs do not complain of the method of assessing or collecting the tax. They complain of the tax itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.