Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F.2d 466 - Pine v. United States

Pine v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

371 F.2d 466 · 1967

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
September 1992
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently September 1992 · most notably Christie v. United States (1975), Scroggins v. United States (1968)

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3701967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estes v. Texas · White v. Maryland · Williams v. Zuckert · Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Lines · Williams v. Zuckert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no absolute requirement that a party exhaust his administrative remedies before coming into this court,” especially where”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.