Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

371 F.2d 583

Docket No. 17195.

Barnhart v. Maxwell

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-01-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Loum v. Underwood · Barnhart v. Maxwell · Preston R. Reams v. David L. Davis, Warden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-01-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Graham P. Barnhart, in pro. per.

William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Leo J. Conway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barnhart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E.2d 752.

¶2

The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evidentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F.2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F.2d 866 (C.A. 6).

¶3

Affirmed.

/371/f2d/583 · .json · Public domain