United States v. Berriel’s Empirical Analysis
371 F.2d 587 · 1967
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Berman · United States v. Burkeen · United States v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Such an assignment [a single attorney for co-defendants] is not, in itself, a denial of effective assistance of counsel. Since Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942), it has been clear that some conflict of interest must be shown before an appellant can successfully claim that representation by an attorney also engaged by another defendant deprived him of his right to counsel”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.