Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F.2d 994 - Davidson v. United States

Davidson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

371 F.2d 994 · 1966

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
6
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1982

9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

110196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Massiah v. United States · Spano v. People of the State of New York · 62 Cal. 2d 338 - People v. Dorado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * * * * "* * * The confession here is not only a voluntary one but it is a volunteered confession made without solicitation or interrogation by the officers. Actually, appellant stands in the same position as the man who walks into the police station and confesses a crime. In Miranda v. State of Arizona * * * Chief Justice Warren commented, `There is no requirement that police stop a person who enters a police station and states that he wishes to confess to a crime, or a person "47. People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338, 354 , 42 Cal. Rptr. 169, 179 , 398 P.2d 361, 371 (1965). who calls the police to offer a confession or any other statement he desires to make. Volunteered statements of any kind are not barred by the Fifth Amendment and their admissibility is not affected by our holding today.' That statement by the Chief Justice imports to us that protections afforded under both the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are not to be applied in cases involving volunteered confessions. * * *" * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.