Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F.3d 1199 - Peterson

Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

13 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 39 Kan. App. 2d 455 - Droge v. Rempel (2008), 507 F. Supp. 2d 1150 - Allen v. Kline (2007)

13 district · 1 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Maryland v. Garrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right. This is not to say that an official action is protected by qualified immunity unless the very action in question has previously been held unlawful, but it is to say that in light of pre-existing law the unlawfulness must be apparent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Thus, the search became unconstitutional only if it continued after the defendants realized, or reasonably should have realized, that the people named in the warrant as occupants of the apartment no longer resided there.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]sserting a qualified immunity defense via a Rule 12(b)(6) motion ... subjects the defendant to a more challenging standard of review than would apply on summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.