United States v. Pfeifer’s Empirical Analysis
371 F.3d 430 · 2004
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Faretta v. California · Edwards v. Arizona · Lynce v. Mathis · Iowa v. Tovar · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 436 . The reasoning in Pfeifer 7 A-3099-11T3 upholding the defendant's conviction applies here as well. Frazier's disqualification because he is unable to legally use a firearm does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the state or federal constitution. III Frazier claims also that the DOC's fragmented litigation based on the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not retroactive simply because it 'draws upon antecedent facts for its operation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.